Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41354742›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Minimally invasive tubular decompression versus traditional open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmet Kartal, Noel F Manalil, Mousa K Hamad, Shahier Paracha, Anthony Robayo, Evan Wang, Ibrahim Hussain, Roger Härtl

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmet KartalDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA. ahk4006@med.cornell.edu.
Noel F ManalilDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Mousa K HamadDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Shahier ParachaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Anthony RobayoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Evan WangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Ibrahim HussainDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Roger HärtlDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive (MI) tubular decompression seeks to reduce soft‑tissue trauma compared with open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We performed a PRISMA‑compliant systematic review and meta‑analysis of comparative studies (2015-April 2025) identified in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Adults with symptomatic degenerative LSS undergoing MI tubular decompression or open laminectomy were included. Evaluated outcomes included surgical parameters (e.g., overall complications; dural tears, surgical site infections, reoperation), perioperative and postoperative complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Heterogeneity was measured using I

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalLaminectomyLumbar VertebraeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSpinal StenosisHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)Meta-analysisMinimally invasive spine surgery (MISS)Open laminectomySystematic reviewTubular decompression

Identifiers

PMID41354742
PMCPMC12764488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.