Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41354739›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identification of plant-parasitic nematode genera in turfgrass using deep learning algorithms.

Vikram Rangarajan, Fereshteh Shahoveisi, Benjamin D Waldo, Sadegh Jafari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vikram RangarajanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Fereshteh ShahoveisiDepartment of Plant Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. fereshteh.shahoveisi@gmail.com.
Benjamin D WaldoMycology and Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Northeast Area, 10300 Baltimore Ave, Beltsville, MD, USA. benjamin.waldo@usda.gov.
Sadegh JafariDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes are an important threat to turfgrass. Left unmanaged, they can cause serious reductions in the quality and playability of golf courses and sports fields. Effective nematode management depends on accurate identification of the nematode genera extracted from soil samples. However, this process requires specialized expertise in nematology, which is often limited in plant diagnostic laboratories. Recent advancements in deep learning models offer promising solutions for the future of nematode identification. In this study, we evaluated the performance of EfficientNet V2-S, MobileNetV3-L, ResNet101, and Swin Transformer V2-B convolutional neural network model architectures in the classification of seven nematode taxa associated with turfgrass. Models were trained using a dataset of 5406 plant-parasitic nematode images where the dataset was split into 70, 15, and 15% for training, testing, and validation, respectively. Data augmentation and hyperparameter optimization using a combined Bayesian optimization and Hyperband algorithm (BOHB) approach were used to improve the model performance. Balanced classification accuracy on the test set was highest for EfficientNet V2-S and Swin Transformer V2-B at 94.63% and 94.34%, respectively. MobileNetV3-L and ResNet101 had lower balanced accuracies of 90.83% and 86.33%, respectively. Testing the models on an additional dataset using a user-end platform indicated the superiority of EfficientNet V2-S to other models with 82.47% accuracy. The findings of this study indicate the potential application of deep learning tools for accurate nematode identification to aid in diagnostics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNematodaPlant DiseasesPoaceaeAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremNeural Networks, ComputerBayesian optimizationConvolutional neural networkHyperband algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41354739
PMCPMC12764819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.