ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of plant-parasitic nematode genera in turfgrass using deep learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beech leaf disease symptom detection using deep learning and computer vision tools.Journal of nematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-parasitic nematodes are an important threat to turfgrass. Left unmanaged, they can cause serious reductions in the quality and playability of golf courses and sports fields. Effective nematode management depends on accurate identification of the nematode genera extracted from soil samples. However, this process requires specialized expertise in nematology, which is often limited in plant diagnostic laboratories. Recent advancements in deep learning models offer promising solutions for the future of nematode identification. In this study, we evaluated the performance of EfficientNet V2-S, MobileNetV3-L, ResNet101, and Swin Transformer V2-B convolutional neural network model architectures in the classification of seven nematode taxa associated with turfgrass. Models were trained using a dataset of 5406 plant-parasitic nematode images where the dataset was split into 70, 15, and 15% for training, testing, and validation, respectively. Data augmentation and hyperparameter optimization using a combined Bayesian optimization and Hyperband algorithm (BOHB) approach were used to improve the model performance. Balanced classification accuracy on the test set was highest for EfficientNet V2-S and Swin Transformer V2-B at 94.63% and 94.34%, respectively. MobileNetV3-L and ResNet101 had lower balanced accuracies of 90.83% and 86.33%, respectively. Testing the models on an additional dataset using a user-end platform indicated the superiority of EfficientNet V2-S to other models with 82.47% accuracy. The findings of this study indicate the potential application of deep learning tools for accurate nematode identification to aid in diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.