Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41354729›Full record

ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2025

Clinical utility of genome sequencing in rare diseases: lessons from a single-center study of 1,452 Korean families.

Seungbok Lee, Go Hun Seo, Soo Yeon Kim, Se Song Jang, Seoyun Jang, Songji Choi, Hyungjin Chin, Seung Jae Lee, Dong Eon Oh, Seung Woo Ryu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Seungbok Lee *Department of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Go Hun Seo *3billion Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Soo Yeon Kim *Department of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Se Song JangDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seoyun JangDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Songji ChoiDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hyungjin ChinDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Jae LeeDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Eon OhDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Woo Ryu3billion Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Jihye Kim3billion Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Dongseok Moon3billion Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Seokhui Jang3billion Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Byung Chan LimDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jangsup MoonDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Heonjong Han3billion Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Hane Lee3billion Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Jong-Hee ChaeDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. chaeped1@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2022-II220333National Research Foundation of Korea 2020M3E5D7086780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome sequencing (GS) was applied to 3317 individuals from 1452 Korean families with suspected rare genetic disorders to assess diagnostic yield and clinical utility. Patients were categorized into 16 clinical subgroups with curated phenotypes, and variant interpretation was refined by post-analytic phenotype matching. A molecular diagnosis was achieved in 46.2% of families, influencing clinical management in 18.5% of diagnosed cases. Family-based GS had a higher yield than singleton testing (48.5% vs. 41.5%). Neuromuscular and neurodevelopmental disorders showed the highest yields. GS-specific variant types, including deep intronic, noncoding, complex structural variants, and tandem repeat expansions, accounted for 14.6% of diagnoses. Secondary findings were identified in 4.3% of individuals. Novel disease-associated genes such as RYBP, DNAJA3, CAMK2D, and small nuclear RNA genes were also reported. These results highlight the diagnostic power of GS and support its use as a first-tier test, especially in underrepresented populations.

Identifiers

PMID41354729
PMCPMC12774877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.