ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2025
Clinical utility of genome sequencing in rare diseases: lessons from a single-center study of 1,452 Korean families.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Neuromuscular Disorders in Children Through the Lens of Next-Generation Sequencing: A Study of Diagnostic Yield.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome sequencing (GS) was applied to 3317 individuals from 1452 Korean families with suspected rare genetic disorders to assess diagnostic yield and clinical utility. Patients were categorized into 16 clinical subgroups with curated phenotypes, and variant interpretation was refined by post-analytic phenotype matching. A molecular diagnosis was achieved in 46.2% of families, influencing clinical management in 18.5% of diagnosed cases. Family-based GS had a higher yield than singleton testing (48.5% vs. 41.5%). Neuromuscular and neurodevelopmental disorders showed the highest yields. GS-specific variant types, including deep intronic, noncoding, complex structural variants, and tandem repeat expansions, accounted for 14.6% of diagnoses. Secondary findings were identified in 4.3% of individuals. Novel disease-associated genes such as RYBP, DNAJA3, CAMK2D, and small nuclear RNA genes were also reported. These results highlight the diagnostic power of GS and support its use as a first-tier test, especially in underrepresented populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.