ArticleParasitology research2025
Response and therapeutic failure to meglumine antimoniate, the first-line drug for cutaneous leishmaniasis infections in Colombian soldiers.
Article in Parasitology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease caused by Leishmania protozoa, transmitted through infected female phlebotomine sandflies. Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), its most common form, causes considerable morbidity, particularly among Colombian military personnel in endemic areas. Although meglumine antimoniate (MA) remains the first-line treatment, increasing reports of therapeutic failure (TF) raise concerns about its efficacy and highlight the need to identify associated risk factors. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors linked to MA treatment outcomes in Colombian soldiers with CL and to characterise the Leishmania species involved and their geographic distribution. A total of 128 soldiers diagnosed with CL (2018-2019) were followed for treatment response. Sociodemographic, clinical and lesion data were collected. Leishmania species were identified through HSP70 and MPI gene barcoding, and geographic origins were mapped. Selected isolates from TF patients underwent in vitro susceptibility testing to MA. The cure proportion was 67.9%, with TF in 32%. Factors significantly associated with TF included previous infections (p = 0.001), prior MA use (p = 0.000), lymphadenopathy (p = 0.008) and lesion type (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified previous treatment (p = 0.000), lesion size and infections acquired in the Orinoquía (p = 0.013) and Pacific (p = 0.014) regions as risk factors. L. (V.) braziliensis predominated, especially in Orinoquía and Amazon regions; L. (V.) panamensis was widespread, and L. (L.) mexicana appeared only in the Andean region. In vitro resistance to MA was not observed in analysed isolates; thus, this factor does not appear related to TF. TF is linked to specific clinical and epidemiological variables, supporting their integration into patient monitoring during MA therapy. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.