ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating the knowledge of general dental practitioners regarding local anesthetic injections in pediatric patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inducing efficient anesthesia makes the dental procedures easier for pediatric patients and the dentist. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of general dental practitioners regarding local anesthetic injections in children. This cross-sectional survey was conducted on 346 general practitioners in Iran. Data were collected by a questionnaire that consisted of three sections: demographic characteristics, general information concerning local anesthesia, and knowledge questions. The Shapiro-Wilk test confirmed the normality of the knowledge score, and independent t-tests and ANOVA were employed to compare the scores. The results showed that general dental practitioners had an average age of 30.1 years (SD = 10.5). Of the participants, 50.6% were female, with an average time since graduation of 62.5 months (SD = 6.7). The mean knowledge score was 8.25 out of 15 (possible range = (0–15)), with a 95% confidence interval of (8.017, 8.483). Participants in retraining courses and those who completed a practical educational anesthesia course after graduation had significantly higher knowledge scores (P < 0.001). The results indicated that just 8.2% of participants were able to correctly apply the aspiration technique, in contrast to 52.9% who correctly identified the maximum recommended dose (MRD) of prilocaine, and 40.2% who accurately knew the height for injection. General dental practitioners exhibited a moderate knowledge (mean knowledge score was 8.25 out of 15) of local anesthetic injections for pediatric patients. However, their knowledge in critical areas such as the MRD of local anesthetics, aspiration techniques, and the correct height for injection was significantly lacking. There is a clear need for general dentists to undergo retraining courses focused on pediatric anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.