ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
A rapid urinary test for combining PSA and zinc to enhance prostate cancer diagnosis: results from a prospective study.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nano-biosensors for circulating tumor markers: advancing liquid biopsy toward precision cancer diagnostics.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Epigenetic and Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Bridging Tumor Heterogeneity and Clinical Implementation.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe need for simple, non-invasive biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis is increasing. Urinary PSA (uPSA) and Zinc (uZinc) are emerging as potential PCa risk indicators. This study aimed to develop a rapid urine test combining uPSA and uZinc, assessing its diagnostic value alone and with Standard of Care (SOC) parameters, including age, serum PSA, DRE, and multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI).
methodsWe enrolled 260 men undergoing prostate biopsy. Post-massage urine samples were analyzed using a rapid urine test combining lateral flow immunoassay (uPSA) and colorimetric dipstick assay (uZinc) with confirmatory testing via ELISA and colorimetric in vitro assay. Logistic regression models (SOC, uPSA, uZinc, Urine test [uPSA + uZinc], SOC + Urine test) and mpMRI models were tested. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using AUCs from ROC analysis. A decision-making algorithm targeting patients with increased PSA up to 10 ng/mL, negative DRE, and PIRADS ≤ 3 was proposed to assess the number of unnecessary biopsies potentially avoided with the urine test.
resultsAmong 242 evaluable patients, 146 (59%) had PCa. The rapid Urine test provided intensity scores inversely proportional to biomarker concentration. uPSA strongly correlated with clinical stage, D'Amico risk, and Gleason score, while uZinc showed a weaker trend. The Urine test reached an AUC of 0.769, which improved performance to 0.789 with SOC + Urine test (p = 0.0002). Combining urine markers with mpMRI yielded AUCs of 0.868 (mpMRI+Urine test) and 0.875 (mpMRI+SOC+Urine test; p < 0.0001). The decision-making algorithm integrating urine test demonstrated that 51% of men could safely avoid biopsy, with a 13% detection rate of only low-grade PCas (ISUP < 2) in this group.
conclusionsThis uPSA/uZinc urine test is a promising adjunct to current diagnostic pathways, improving accuracy in detecting clinically significant PCa while reducing unnecessary biopsies. Its integration with mpMRI and SOC parameters could refine risk assessment and personalize patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.