Exploring Access to and Use of Community Resources and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Interest Among Black and Latina Women in Texas.

Erin N Benton, Frances Cates, Sabrina Benitez, Liesl A Nydegger

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erin N BentonDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Education, College of Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Frances CatesPlan II Honors Program, College of Liberal Arts, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Sabrina BenitezDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Liesl A NydeggerDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Education, College of Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026

$5.2M

NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leveraging community resources to address disparities in HIV and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use across Black and Latino/a communities is of high importance, yet little is known about how community members utilize these resources. We explored the use of community resources and PrEP among Black and Latina women at high risk for HIV by conducting semistructured interviews with 18 Black and Latina women from May 2018 to November 2019 in Austin, Texas. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. We found that the majority of participants used community resources, including shelters, domestic violence resources, counseling, and education/workplace resources. Several barriers to the use of community resources were intimate partner violence, financial and employment issues, and stigma. Most women were interested in PrEP use, and those who used community resources were more open to PrEP use than those who did not use community resources. Future work should focus on promoting PrEP through community resources.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHealth Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoHIV InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaTexasWhiteAnti-HIV AgentsBlack cisgender womencommunity resourcesHIVLatina cisgender womenPrEP

Identifiers

PMID41354553

DOI10.1177/10872914251404006

PMCPMC13535592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.