ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2026
Clinical Effects of Using the Combined Technique in the First Attempt for Acute Large-vessel Occlusion, with Specific Reference to Age Differences.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combined technique (simultaneous use of a stent retriever and contact aspiration) is widely used for mechanical thrombectomy to treat acute large-vessel occlusions, but its clinical benefits remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of different vessel-recanalization strategies on clinical outcomes across age groups. We analyzed 301 consecutive patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusions. Between January 2017 and March 2021, 145 patients underwent single-device mechanical thrombectomy (stent retriever or contact aspiration) as the first-line strategy. Between April 2021 and December 2023, the combined technique was used as the first-line strategy in 96 patients. The modified first-pass effect (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade ≥2b), final reperfusion outcomes, and functional outcomes were compared between strategy groups in patients <75 years and ≥75 years. In patients aged <75 years, the modified first-pass effect rate was significantly higher in the first-line combined-technique group than in the first-line single-device group (68.1% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.033), but favorable functional outcomes were similar. In patients ≥75 years, the first-line combined-technique group showed higher modified first-pass effect rates (61.3% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.03) and more frequent favorable functional outcomes than the first-line single-device group (31.3% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.0079). Thus, when performing mechanical thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusions, the combined technique should be used as a first-line strategy in older patients, as it is associated with more favorable functional outcomes than a first-line single-device strategy. In contrast, the favorable outcome rate in younger patients does not appear to differ by strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.