Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41354427›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2026

Changes in Referral Rates After the Mandate of Charging Additional Fees for Non-referral First Visits: A Controlled Interrupted Time-series Analysis.

Arisa Iba, Takehiro Sugiyama, Yuta Taniguchi, Ai Suzuki, Taeko Watanabe, Hiroyasu Iso, Nanako Tamiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arisa IbaInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of Global Health Cooperation, Japan Institute for Health Security.ORCID 0000-0003-1067-5231
Takehiro SugiyamaInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of Global Health Cooperation, Japan Institute for Health Security.
Yuta TaniguchiInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of Global Health Cooperation, Japan Institute for Health Security.ORCID 0000-0002-0176-2379
Ai SuzukiGraduate School, University of Tsukuba.
Taeko WatanabeDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.
Hiroyasu IsoInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of Global Health Cooperation, Japan Institute for Health Security.ORCID 0000-0002-9241-7289
Nanako TamiyaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn April 2016, Japan mandated higher-level hospitals (ie, Special Functioning Hospitals [SFHs] and Regional Medical Care Support Hospitals [RMCSHs] with ≥500 beds) to charge additional fees for non-referral first visits to facilitate hospital function differentiation. The mandate expanded to RMCSHs with 400-499 beds and 200-399 beds in April 2018 and April 2020, respectively. We investigated changes in referral rates (proportion of referred to first-visit patients) before and after the fee's implementation.

methodsUsing a community-based insurance claims database from a single prefecture in Japan, we extracted claims for first visits to hospitals with ≥200 beds between April 2014 and March 2022 and calculated monthly referral rates to five hospital groups (SFHs, RMCSHs with ≥500, 400-499, and 200-399 beds, and non-designated hospitals with ≥200 beds). We conducted a controlled interrupted time-series analysis by hospital category, treating non-designated hospitals as controls.

resultsOf 405,087 first-visit patients (mean age 54.9; standard deviation, 20.2 years; 53.2% female), 157,734 (38.9%) had a referral. The average referral rate to SFHs was high pre-mandate and did not increase. With the mandate, referral rates to RMSCHs with ≥500 beds and 400-499 beds rose by 5.10% points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-8.35) in 2016 and 4.49% points (95% CI, 0.28-8.70) in 2018, respectively, and stabilized afterward. Referral rates to RMCSHs with 200-399 beds remained unchanged.

conclusionAverage referral rates increased when the additional fee was mandated for RMCSHs with ≥400 beds, although the influence on health outcomes remains unclear.

Indexed as

Fees and ChargesReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisJapanMaleMiddle Agedcost-sharinginterrupted time-series analysisJapanreferral

Identifiers

PMID41354427
PMCPMC13085651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.