ReviewDrug and alcohol review2026
The Emergence of Novel Benzodiazepines in Australia, Evidence, Alerts, Clinical Management and Harm Reduction-A Narrative Review.
Review in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of Patient-Reported Exposure to New Psychoactive Substances and Other Illicit Drugs in Australian Emergency Departments: Findings From the Emerging Drugs Network of Australia.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
- The Emergence of Novel Benzodiazepines in Australia, Evidence, Alerts, Clinical Management and Harm Reduction-A Narrative Review.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
issuesIn Australia, detections of novel benzodiazepines (NBZ) and related overdoses have increased markedly over the last five years. This review summarises Australian peer-reviewed literature and NBZ-related drug alerts, outlines the pharmacology of commonly detected NBZs and discusses approaches to harm reduction, managing toxicity, dependence and withdrawal. APPROACH: Australian peer-reviewed articles published between January 2020 and June 2025 were identified via Embase, PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO. Drug alerts from this period were retrieved from an Australian online repository. Data were extracted, coded and synthesised. Global literature on the pharmacology associated with commonly detected NBZs in Australia, was retrieved via Google Scholar as were sources on benzodiazepine-related harm reduction and clinical management and narratively summarised. KEY
findingsBetween 2020 and 2025, NBZs were frequently detected from data from emergency department, forensic, drug checking and coronial sources. The most common were etizolam, clonazolam, clobromazolam, bromazolam, flualprazolam and flubromazolam. Twenty-three NBZ-related alerts were issued over this period, with nearly half of these (n = 11) issued between January and June of 2025. Health responses are hindered by limited pharmacological data, detection challenges and little research on the experiences of consumers. IMPLICATIONS: To inform interventions spanning harm reduction and clinical management, future research must develop understandings of the pharmacology of NBZs and the experiences of people who source NBZs from unregulated markets.
conclusionNBZs were consistently detected across Australian coronial, toxicological, forensic and drug checking data sources from 2020 to 2025. Their emergence represents a public health concern, worthy of ongoing attention and response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.