ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Rapid Exploration of the Assembly Chemical Space of Molecular Graphs.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular assembly as a universal biosignature measurable by mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Mapping Evolution of Molecules across Biochemistry with Assembly Theory.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- CBR-db: A Cheminformatic Database for Biochemical Reaction Analysis.ACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying how hard it is to build a molecular graph matters for biosignature detection, chemical complexity, and cheminformatics. We present an exact, scalable algorithm to compute the molecular assembly index (MA), which prioritizes the largest duplicate subgraphs, represents fragmentation with an array of edge-lists, and prunes the search with both dynamic programming via a hash table of assembly states and a branch-and-bound heuristic guided by a conditional addition-chain lower bound. For organic molecules in the greater-than-500 Da range, our approach is up to 6 orders of magnitude faster than prior methods and yields exact MAs where previous algorithms would have timed out. We compute MAs to convergence for ∼300k COCONUT natural products with <50 bonds, profiling time and memory scaling. Finally, we exploit the speed of our algorithm to calculate joint assembly spaces and introduce the Joint Assembly Overlap (JAO), a Jaccard-like metric that emphasizes global scaffold reuse, and show that the JAO yields substantially different rankings from Tanimoto similarity with ECFP fingerprints and MCS (e.g., in steroids 270-380 Da and short peptides), accounting for substructural similarity beyond local environments. Together, these advances turn the molecular assembly index into a practical tool for large-scale exploration of chemical space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.