ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Reduced postoperative inflammation and blood loss after robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental compared with total knee arthroplasty: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRobotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (raUKA) offers potential advantages over robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA), but its biological benefits remain unclear. Superior early recovery after raUKA may be related to reduced systemic inflammation and blood loss. It was hypothesised that raUKA would elicit a lower systemic inflammatory response and result in reduced perioperative blood loss compared with raTKA.
methodsPatients undergoing raUKA with the Mako® system were 1:1 propensity score-matched to raTKA patients based on age, gender, body mass index, and ASA score, yielding two balanced cohorts (n = 162 each). Blood samples were collected preoperatively, 6 h postoperatively, and on postoperative Days 3 and 5. Primary outcomes were C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) levels; secondary outcomes included operative time and calculated blood loss.
resultsCRP increases were significantly lower after raUKA on Day 3 (1.6 vs. 4.6 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and Day 5 (0.8 vs. 3.7 mg/dL, p = 0.031). WBC counts were lower at 6 h in raUKA (3.8 vs. 4.5 G/L, p = 0.041) but not significantly different on Days 3 or 5. Median operative time was shorter with raUKA (81 vs. 95 minutes, p < 0.001). Haemoglobin decrease and estimated blood loss were reduced in raUKA compared with raTKA (532 vs. 669 mL, p < 0.001).
conclusionThis is the first study to directly compare inflammatory response and blood loss between raUKA and raTKA. raUKA was associated with lower CRP and early WBC elevations, reduced blood loss, and shorter operative times. These results provide clinically relevant biomarker reference values and highlight perioperative advantages of raUKA. Collectively, they support raUKA as a less invasive alternative to raTKA in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.