Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353715›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2026

Does Adjuvant Therapy in Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas Improve Survival? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using Trial Sequential Analysis.

Carlo Ingaldi, Vincenzo D'Ambra, Claudio Ricci, Laura Alberici, Marina Migliori, Mariacristina Di Marco, Andrea Palloni, Cristina Mosconi, Carla Serra, Riccardo Casadei

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carlo IngaldiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-9024
Vincenzo D'AmbraDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5859-1543
Claudio RicciDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Laura AlbericiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marina MiglioriDivision of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Mariacristina Di MarcoDivision of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea PalloniDivision of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Cristina MosconiDivision of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carla SerraDivision of Interventional Ultrasound, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo CasadeiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health RC-2025-2797188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (ADJ) in patients with resected invasive IPMNs, compared with follow-up (FUP).

methodsA random effects meta-analysis was performed. Meta-regression analysis was used to clarify heterogeneity. The trial sequential analysis was used to test Type I and Type II errors, defining the required information size (RIS). The primary endpoint was OS, and the secondary endpoint was DFS.

resultsThe accrued sample size (AIS) was 2422 patients for OS and 493 patients for DFS. OS and DFS in the ADJ arm were similar to the FUP arm (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.81-1.79, p = 0.349 and HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.64-1.51, p = 0.936). The RIS were 2422 for OS and 254 for DFS, allowing the exclusion of Type II errors. For the primary endpoint, heterogeneity was high (I

conclusionAdjuvant therapy should not be administered indiscriminately to all patients. Node-positive invasive IPMN seems to have an improved OS.

trial registrationPROSPERO 2024 CRD42024561326.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoplasm Invasivenessadjuvant therapyIPMNpancreatic cancersurvival

Identifiers

PMID41353715
PMCPMC12831527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.