ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Divergent outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced small-cell lung cancer: two cases report and literature review.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article reports two cases of stage IIIB small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, resulting in markedly different clinical outcomes, and explores the potential molecular mechanisms behind these differences. Both patients were diagnosed with stage IIIB small cell lung cancer through imageological examination and CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. They received three cycles of neoadjuvant treatment with “etoposide + carboplatin + serplulimab” followed by surgical resection of the lesions. Genetic testing for solid tumors was conducted before and after treatment. The results showed that Case 1 exhibited multiple gene mutations, including FBXW7 and KRAS, with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) of 17.65 muts/Mb before treatment. After neoadjuvant therapy, only the PTEN mutation remained, and TMB decreased to 0.00 muts/Mb, with no cancer cells observed in the postoperative pathology, leading to an assessment of pathological complete response (pCR). In contrast, Case 2 showed MET and PTEN mutations and MYC gene amplification both before and after treatment, with TMB increasing from 23.72 muts/Mb to 28.13 muts/Mb, resulting in an assessment of disease progression (PD) post-surgery. This study emphasizes the potential value of neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced SCLC patients and highlights the importance of genetic testing in predicting treatment responses and guiding personalized treatment strategies. Further research is needed to explore more effective therapeutic strategies to improve the prognosis of SCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.