ReviewJournal of neonatal-perinatal medicine2026
The role of abdominal ultrasound in surgical decision making for necrotizing enterocolitis.
Review in Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Necrotizing enterocolitis": a paradigm shift.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in neonatal care, Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains one of the most devastating gastrointestinal complications affecting most often preterm infants and full -term infants with congenital heart disease. Early and accurate diagnosis is vital to reduce morbidity and mortality. While abdominal radiography has traditionally served as the cornerstone of diagnosis, abdominal ultrasound (AUS) emerges as an additional tool offering the benefits of a real-time, radiation-free and functional assessment of the bowel. However, the role of AUS in the assessment of need for surgery remains less clear. This commentary addresses some of the available observational studies and existing evidence on the role of AUS for the diagnosis of NEC and the challenges associated with implementation of this practice, and the lack of well-designed prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.