ReviewAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists2026
Brief user-controlled admission (BUCA) in psychiatric care.
Review in Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brief User-Controlled Admission (BUCA) refers to a set of crisis interventions in which the traditional gatekeeping role of the physician is bypassed, allowing service users to independently decide when to access short-term inpatient care through a pre-negotiated agreement. Examples include Brief Admission by self-referral, Patient-Initiated Brief Admission, Patient-Controlled Admission, and Self-Referral to Inpatient Treatment. The structured agreement promotes predictability and collaboration, enabling the user to assume control over their care. BUCA has been studied in adults and adolescents with severe mental distress at risk for escalation of symptoms, self-harm or suicide. Users report high satisfaction, describing the agreement as a source of psychological safety, dignity, and proactive crisis management. Staff experience strengthened therapeutic alliances and role shifts from gatekeeping to collaboration. Families experience relief, though they may need information and support adapting to the user-led structure. BUCA has been associated with increased functioning in daily life, and lower healthcare costs, particularly among users with high service utilization. While earlier studies have suggested potential reductions in inpatient care, studies including controls have not proven significant effects. Representing a shift towards user-led care, BUCA offers a scalable and potentially cost-effective model aligned with current mental health reform priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.