Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353563›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2026

RIFinder reveals widespread adaptive remote introgression in grass genomes.

Yujie Huang, Shiyu Zhang, Hanyang Lin, Chenxu Liu, Zhefu Li, Kun Yang, Yutong Liu, Linfeng Jin, Chuanlong Lu, Yuan Cheng and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yujie HuangInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Shiyu ZhangInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hanyang LinSchool of Advanced Study, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Chenxu LiuState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Vegetable Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Zhefu LiInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Kun YangInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yutong LiuInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Linfeng JinInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chuanlong LuState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Vegetable Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Yuan ChengState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Vegetable Research Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Chaoyi HuHainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Sanya, China.
Huifang ZhaoInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Guoping ZhangInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qian QianYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China.
Longjiang FanInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China; Institute of Bioinformatics & James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. Electronic address: fanlj@zju.edu.cn.
Dongya WuInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of Bioinformatics & James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Center for Evolutionary & Organismal Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. Electronic address: wudongya@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic transfers are pervasive across both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, primarily involving canonical genomic introgression between species or genera and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) across kingdoms. However, DNA transfer between phylogenetically distant species, which differs from canonical introgression and HGT in certain aspects of its temporal scale and mechanistic features, here defined as remote introgression (RI), has received less attention in evolutionary genomics. In this study, we present RIFinder, a novel phylogeny-based method for the detection of RI events, and apply it to a comprehensive dataset of 122 grass genomes. Our analysis identifies 622 RI events originating from 543 distinct homologous genes, revealing distinct characteristics among grass subfamilies. Specifically, the subfamily Pooideae contains the largest number of introgressed genes, whereas Bambusoideae contains the fewest. Comparisons among the accepted genes, their donor copies, and native homologs demonstrate that introgressed genes undergo post-transfer localized adaptation and show significant functional enrichment in stress-response pathways. Notably, we identify a large Triticeae-derived segment in the Chloridoideae species Cleistogenes songorica, which is potentially associated with its exceptional drought tolerance. Furthermore, we provide compelling evidence that RI has contributed to the origin and diversification of biosynthetic gene clusters for gramine, a defensive alkaloid chemical, across grass species. Our study establishes a robust method for RI detection and highlights its critical role in adaptive evolution. The Python implementation of RIFinder is publicly available at https://github.com/Ne0tea/RIFinder.

Indexed as

Genetic IntrogressionGenome, PlantPoaceaeEvolution, MolecularGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomicsPhylogenyadaptive evolutiongene clusterphylogenetic incongruenceremote introgression

Identifiers

PMID41353563
PMCPMC12903403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.