ArticleBMC health services research2025
Toward inclusive primary health care: understanding health needs of women in India's informal economy through a socioecological framework.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic review of health challenges experienced by Indian women engaged in informal labor.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2026Review
- The burden of work related musculoskeletal disorders among female beedi workers: a public health perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen in India’s informal economy face significant occupational health risks that remain largely undocumented and unaddressed. With limited labour protections and inadequate access to health services, informal women workers (IWWs) experience overlapping vulnerabilities related to gender, work conditions, and environmental exposures. This study explored the multi-level determinants of health among IWWs in Ahmedabad, India, to inform gender-responsive integration of occupational health within primary health care systems.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using focus group discussions (FGDs) guided by the Socioecological Model (SEM). Five FGDs were held with 41 women representing key occupational groups—agricultural workers, construction workers, street vendors, home-based workers, and waste recyclers. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, translated, and thematically analysed. Themes were organized across SEM domains: intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy levels.
findingsParticipants reported multiple, intersecting health risks such as musculoskeletal disorders, respiratory problems, skin irritation, and heat-related illnesses. Psychological stress, economic insecurity, and work-family conflict were pervasive, compounded by gendered expectations and absence of social protection. Poor workplace infrastructure, including lack of sanitation and shade exacerbated illness and fatigue. Many women avoided drinking water due to lack of toilets, leading to dehydration and urinary problems. Health-seeking behaviour was shaped by trust and convenience; private clinics were preferred over public facilities despite higher costs. Awareness of government schemes such as Ayushman Bharat and e-Shram was limited. Participants expressed demand for pensions, maternity protection, and home-based livelihood support.
conclusionFindings underscore the urgent need for gender-responsive occupational health integration into primary health care system. The study informed a national policy roundtable that convened key stakeholders to co-develop actionable recommendations to improve occupational health coverage for women in India’s informal economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.