ArticleGenome medicine2025
Life Identification Number (LIN) codes for the genomic taxonomy of Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCorynebacterium diphtheriae, the causative agent of diphtheria, remains a public health concern, especially in regions with low vaccination coverage. While advances in genomic typing, such as core-genome Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (cgMLST), have improved our ability for strain identification, a standardized and stable genomic taxonomy is still lacking. This study aimed to establish a consistent taxonomic classification and nomenclature for C. diphtheriae strains using cgMLST-based Life Identification Number (LIN) codes.
methodsComparing 1,665 genomes from C. diphtheriae and closely related species C. belfantii and C. rouxii, we observed population-level genetic discontinuities in cgMLST profiles dissimilarities, and established hierarchical taxonomic levels based on optimal allelic difference thresholds. Ten-level LIN codes were defined, encompassing broad population structure subdivisions and fine-scale epidemiological levels. The LIN code system was implemented into the BIGSdb-Pasteur platform, and nicknames derived from the 7-loci MLST sequence types were given to sublineages and clonal groups.
resultscgMLST genetic thresholds were first defined at species and lineage levels (minimum of 1,240 and 1,035 allelic differences, respectively). Sublineages (SL), clonal groups (ClG), and genetic clusters (GC) were next defined with progressively finer allelic mismatch thresholds (500, 55, and 25 differences, respectively). A broad population diversity of C. diphtheriae was uncovered, with the distinction of > 400 SLs and > 1,000 GCs. For epidemiological purposes, five shallow-level thresholds (8, 4, 2,1, and 0 allelic mismatches) were defined, completing the 10-level LIN code taxonomy. We illustrate LIN codes applicability to investigate the genetic diversity and transmission chains of relevant clusters, such as SL8 (the 1990s ex-USSR outbreak) or SL384 (involved in outbreaks in Yemen and Europe).
conclusionsThe cgMLST-based LIN code system provides a stable genomic taxonomy for strains of C. diphtheriae, C. rouxii and C. belfantii. By defining ten hierarchical levels of resolution, this system effectively captures its phylogenetic diversity, facilitating population biology research and epidemiological surveillance. The public availability of this system in the BIGSdb-Pasteur platform provides a standardized framework for diphtheria genomic epidemiology with potential to harmonize global surveillance of diphtheria resurgence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.