ArticleBMC public health2025
Identification of risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection in Xinjiang using machine learning.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in LTBI individuals screened from close contacts: a retrospective case-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLatent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a significant reservoir for active tuberculosis development. Identifying key risk factors is crucial for prevention strategies. Machine learning techniques can uncover complex relationships between risk factors and disease outcomes.
methodsData were collected from China's Tuberculosis Management Information System. LTBI was defined by positive tuberculin skin tests. A case-control design comparing LTBI (n = 669) with active tuberculosis (ATB, n = 669) patients was employed. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using age, gender, and education level. Four machine learning models (random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, and neural network) were developed for feature importance analysis. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and logistic regression identified key risk factors. Bootstrap resampling (n = 1,000 iterations) assessed model stability with 95% confidence intervals. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis provided feature importance interpretation. A risk nomogram was constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.
resultsAmong 1,338 matched participants, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance (AUC = 0.898, accuracy = 85.7%, sensitivity = 84.2%, specificity = 86.9%). SHAP analysis revealed age group (mean |SHAP value|=0.818) as the most influential predictor, followed by medical insurance type (0.599), income group (0.523), and education level (0.439). Logistic regression identified 11 significant risk factors: age (OR = 2.35, 95%CI: 1.86-2.96), BMI (OR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.71-0.93), smoking status, occupational dust exposure, diabetes, medical insurance type, immunosuppressant use, education level, silicosis, anemia, and TB contact history. The nomogram showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.839) and clinical utility, identifying 64.44% of subjects as high-risk with 53.62% confirmed as true positives at 20% risk threshold.
conclusionThis study successfully identified key LTBI risk factors using machine learning approaches. The developed nomogram provides a practical tool for targeted screening in resource-limited settings. Interventions targeting modifiable factors such as smoking cessation and occupational dust control may reduce LTBI and active TB burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.