Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353505›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Thermochemical evaluation of biochars properties from Portuguese agro-forestry residues for solid fuel applications.

Amadeu D S Borges, Mariana Cardoso, Miguel Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amadeu D S BorgesLaboratory of Thermal Sciences and Sustainability, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001 801, Vila Real, Portugal. amadeub@utad.pt.
Mariana CardosoLaboratory of Thermal Sciences and Sustainability, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001 801, Vila Real, Portugal.
Miguel OliveiraLaboratory of Thermal Sciences and Sustainability, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001 801, Vila Real, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a high-quality comparative characterization of biochars derived from regionally significant Portuguese feedstocks: hazelnut shell, pine, pinecone, oak pruning waste, and swine manure. All feedstocks were subjected to pyrolysis at 450 °C to evaluate their potential as solid fuels. The results demonstrate the clear superiority of woody-based biochars for energy applications, with hazelnut shell biochar exhibiting the highest fixed carbon (up to 82.89%) and the highest lower heating value (up to 31.64 MJ/kg). In contrast, swine manure biochar proved unsuitable as a standalone fuel due to its extremely high ash content (48.34%). A notable preliminary finding, based on a single case study, was the significant improvement in carbon content in a slow-cooled hazelnut sample, suggesting that post-pyrolysis conditions are not chemically inert and offer a promising avenue for future research in biochar optimization. This work highlights a hierarchical valorisation model for local biomass, classifying feedstocks for optimal use in premium fuel production, general energy applications, or soil amendment based on their distinct thermochemical properties.

Indexed as

BiocharBiomass residuesEnergy densityFixed carbonHeating valuePyrolysis

Identifiers

PMID41353505
PMCPMC12789607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.