ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal and spatial characterization of physiological noise in rs-fMRI at a high temporal resolution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fMRI signal contains "noise" components resulting from physiological processes that interfere with the component due to neuronal activation and obscure the understanding of brain function. Having the neuronal activation component as the unknown, it is crucial to characterize the spatial and temporal aspects of the signal component that is due to cardiac and breathing cycles. 17 fMRI exams were performed in 9 subjects with a 3T Philipps MRI scanner with high sampling frequency (repetition time 125 ms, one slice). Photoplethysmography was used to track the cardiac cycle, and a pneumatic thoracic respiration transducer was used to measure the breathing cycle. The impact of the physiological signal on fMRI signal was evaluated in four regions of interest: (1) a region encompassing all areas below the subarachnoid space (Global Signal - GS), (2) ventricles (CSF), (3) venous return (VR), and (4) the region surrounding Middle Cerebral Arteries (MCA). Physiological noise is found heterogeneous across the ROIs in terms of amplitude and phase. The impact of respiration on the fMRI signal is greater than that of the heart, and it may be mediated by modulation of the venous return.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.