ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Machine learning model for automated calculation of intracochlear positional index in cochlear implantation.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Reading of Postoperative Cochlear Implant X-Rays.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraining and refining both custom and pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models for calculation of intracochlear positional index (ICPI) is as effective as manual calculation. The ICPI is a position factor that is known to influence cochlear implant performance, however manual calculation on computed tomography (CT) imaging is labour-intensive and prone to calculation errors. Automation of this process with machine learning via a custom built CNN model aims to reduce the difficulty in obtaining this position factor. Increasing the number of training epochs will improve accuracy. Our study aims to develop a validated CNN for ICPI calculation, which may improve surgical electrode positioning.
methodsCustom built CNN model and pre-trained ResNet 50 model trained and validated on 34 images, and tested on eight CT images of temporal bones with cochlear implants. The ground truth was manually established by calculating the distance from modiolus to electrode (DE) and lateral wall (DL), and applied to derive the ICPI.
resultsThe pre-trained ResNet-50 model outperformed the custom-built CNN, with improvement statistically significant on evaluation metrics. The ResNet-50 model has lower mean absolute error and root mean squared error (RMSE). In both models, increasing the number of training epochs from ten to 100 improves accuracy of the ICPI calculation.
conclusionOur machine learning models successfully achieved automation of ICPI calculation, with increasing accuracy increasing training epochs to 100 iterations. Future studies should explore optimizing these models and validating them on broader datasets to enhance their applicability in real-world scenarios by comparison to speech and audiometric outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41353482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.