Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353461›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Biochemical and structural attributes of wheat & corn bran hydrolysates in relation to their end use-quality.

Hamna Zafar, Farhan Saeed, Bushra Niaz, Amara Rasheed, Shokhjakhon Akhmedov, Ilmira Jumaniyazova, Faiyaz Ahmed, Muhammad Afzaal, Fakhar Islam, Abdela Befa Kinki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hamna ZafarDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Farhan SaeedDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Bushra NiazDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Amara RasheedDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shokhjakhon AkhmedovDepartment of Economy, Urgench State University, Urgench, Uzbekistan.
Ilmira JumaniyazovaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Mamun University, Khiva, Uzbekistan.
Faiyaz AhmedDepartment of Basic Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, P.O. Box 6666, Buraydah, 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad AfzaalDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan. muhammadafzaal@gcuf.edu.pk.
Fakhar IslamDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan. fakhar.ft440@gmail.com.
Abdela Befa KinkiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. befabdela@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current research investigated the nutritional composition of wheat and corn bran hydrolysates and their impact on bread quality. For this purpose, in the 1st phase wheat and corn bran were subjected to hydrothermal treatment as a pretreatment (at 121 °C for 45 min) to obtain hydrolysates. In the 2nd phase wheat and corn bran hydrolysates was characterized for their chemical composition, antioxidant potential and functional quality. Wheat bran hydrolysates were richer in protein (11.63 ± 0.13%), ash (2.16 ± 0.04%), and nitrogen-free extract (57.66 ± 1.42%), whereas corn bran hydrolysates contained higher fat (5.47 ± 0.07%), fiber (11.79 ± 0.09%), and moisture (16.32 ± 0.15%). Both wheat and corn bran hydrolysates revealed strong antioxidant potential however, wheat bran hydrolysates were richer in phenolic and flavonoids, whereas corn bran hydrolysates showed higher radical scavenging and reducing power activities. In the 3rd phase, bread was prepared using wheat flour and wheat and corn bran hydrolysates in treatments T0, T1, and T2, and subsequently evaluated for structural, textural, and sensory attributes. Structural analysis using FTIR and SEM indicates the incorporation of bran hydrolysates altered the gluten matrix, by introducing diverse functional groups and modifying the bread's microstructure. Textural analysis showed greater firmness in wheat bran hydrolysate bread (T1), which also received the highest sensory scores and overall acceptability. Thus, the results elucidated the potential of wheat and corn bran hydrolysates to improve the nutritional, structural, and sensory quality of bread for functional food applications.

Indexed as

BreadDietary FiberProtein HydrolysatesTriticumZea maysAntioxidantsFlourHumansHydrolysisNutritive ValueAntioxidantsDietary FiberProtein HydrolysatesBakery productsFood SafetyFunctional foodsHealth benefitsHydrolysatesHydrolysisHydrothermal processing

Identifiers

PMID41353461
PMCPMC12780192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.