ArticleScientific reports2025
Biochemical and structural attributes of wheat & corn bran hydrolysates in relation to their end use-quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current research investigated the nutritional composition of wheat and corn bran hydrolysates and their impact on bread quality. For this purpose, in the 1st phase wheat and corn bran were subjected to hydrothermal treatment as a pretreatment (at 121 °C for 45 min) to obtain hydrolysates. In the 2nd phase wheat and corn bran hydrolysates was characterized for their chemical composition, antioxidant potential and functional quality. Wheat bran hydrolysates were richer in protein (11.63 ± 0.13%), ash (2.16 ± 0.04%), and nitrogen-free extract (57.66 ± 1.42%), whereas corn bran hydrolysates contained higher fat (5.47 ± 0.07%), fiber (11.79 ± 0.09%), and moisture (16.32 ± 0.15%). Both wheat and corn bran hydrolysates revealed strong antioxidant potential however, wheat bran hydrolysates were richer in phenolic and flavonoids, whereas corn bran hydrolysates showed higher radical scavenging and reducing power activities. In the 3rd phase, bread was prepared using wheat flour and wheat and corn bran hydrolysates in treatments T0, T1, and T2, and subsequently evaluated for structural, textural, and sensory attributes. Structural analysis using FTIR and SEM indicates the incorporation of bran hydrolysates altered the gluten matrix, by introducing diverse functional groups and modifying the bread's microstructure. Textural analysis showed greater firmness in wheat bran hydrolysate bread (T1), which also received the highest sensory scores and overall acceptability. Thus, the results elucidated the potential of wheat and corn bran hydrolysates to improve the nutritional, structural, and sensory quality of bread for functional food applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.