ArticleNature communications2025
SlingBAG: point cloud-based iterative algorithm for large-scale 3D photoacoustic imaging.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for scaling large-aperture photoacoustic computed tomography : From single fingers to the human hand.Ultrasonics · 2026Article
- SlingBAG: point cloud-based iterative algorithm for large-scale 3D photoacoustic imaging.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Zero-Shot Artifact2Artifact: Self-incentive artifact removal for photoacoustic imaging.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale 3D photoacoustic imaging has become increasingly important for both clinical and pre-clinical applications. Limited by cost and system complexity, only systems with sparsely-distributed sensors can be widely implemented, which necessitates advanced reconstruction algorithms to reduce artifacts. However, the high computing memory and time consumption of traditional iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms is practically unacceptable for large-scale 3D photoacoustic imaging. Here, we propose a point cloud-based IR algorithm that reduces memory consumption by several orders, wherein the 3D photoacoustic scene is modeled as a series of Gaussian-distributed spherical sources stored in form of point cloud. During the IR process, not only are properties of each Gaussian source, including its peak intensity (initial pressure value), standard deviation (size) and mean (position) continuously optimized, but also each Gaussian source itself adaptively undergoes destroying, splitting, and duplication along the gradient direction. This method, named SlingBAG, the sliding Gaussian ball adaptive growth algorithm, enables high-quality large-scale 3D photoacoustic reconstruction with fast iteration and extremely low memory usage. We validated the SlingBAG algorithm in both simulation study and in vivo animal experiments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.