Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353418›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

CMEO: a metadata-centric ontology for clinical studies exploration and harmonization assessment.

Komal Gilani, Wei Wei, Christof Peters, Marlo Verket, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Enrico Nicolis, Martina Colombo, Katharina Marx-Schütt, Visara Urovi, Michel Dumontier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Komal GilaniInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. komal.gilani@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Wei WeiInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Christof PetersCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Marlo VerketDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Hans-Peter Brunner-La RoccaCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Enrico NicolisDepartment of Acute Brain and Cardiovascular Injury, Institute for Pharmacological Research Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Martina ColomboDepartment of Acute Brain and Cardiovascular Injury, Institute for Pharmacological Research Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Katharina Marx-SchüttDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Visara UroviInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Michel DumontierInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of clinical research data across various institutions faces hurdles due to differing definitions, inconsistent terminologies, and inadequate support for interoperable metadata. While biomedical ontologies offer valuable tools for structuring clinical data, they have not yet been fully utilized for creating comprehensive metadata descriptors, such as variable semantics, statistical summaries, and governance elements essential for data discovery and alignment. We present the Clinical Metadata Exploration Ontology (CMEO) that builds upon well-established ontologies to provide a cohesive representation of study designs, data elements, exploratory statistics, and data reuse permissions. CMEO facilitates semantic querying for study exploration and comparison of data elements across studies, particularly when individual-level data cannot be shared. We demonstrate its utility using metadata from five studies: four heart-failure studies and one wearable-based type 1 diabetes study. After serializing, we executed SPARQL queries that operationalized study-level discovery, variable alignment across studies, and governance-constrained reuse. This FAIR-compliant, metadata-driven integration across heterogeneous sources enables scalable, privacy-conscious research and underpins federated clinical data exploration.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesBiomedical ResearchMetadataHumansData interoperabilityMetadata standardizationOntology-driven data managementPrivacy-preserving harmonization

Identifiers

PMID41353418
PMCPMC12798102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.