ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
CMEO: a metadata-centric ontology for clinical studies exploration and harmonization assessment.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in neurocardiology: decoding brain-heart network interactions for clinical and translational insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of clinical research data across various institutions faces hurdles due to differing definitions, inconsistent terminologies, and inadequate support for interoperable metadata. While biomedical ontologies offer valuable tools for structuring clinical data, they have not yet been fully utilized for creating comprehensive metadata descriptors, such as variable semantics, statistical summaries, and governance elements essential for data discovery and alignment. We present the Clinical Metadata Exploration Ontology (CMEO) that builds upon well-established ontologies to provide a cohesive representation of study designs, data elements, exploratory statistics, and data reuse permissions. CMEO facilitates semantic querying for study exploration and comparison of data elements across studies, particularly when individual-level data cannot be shared. We demonstrate its utility using metadata from five studies: four heart-failure studies and one wearable-based type 1 diabetes study. After serializing, we executed SPARQL queries that operationalized study-level discovery, variable alignment across studies, and governance-constrained reuse. This FAIR-compliant, metadata-driven integration across heterogeneous sources enables scalable, privacy-conscious research and underpins federated clinical data exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.