Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353417›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Understanding hesitancy: barriers to HR-HPV self-sampling among women at high risk for cervical cancer in Latvia.

Natalija Berza, Inese Stars, Jana Zodzika, Anda Kivite-Urtane, Kersti Pärna, Anneli Uuskula, Dana Makejeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalija BerzaInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia. natalija.berza@rsu.lv.
Inese StarsInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Jana ZodzikaInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Anda Kivite-UrtaneInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Kersti PärnaInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Anneli UuskulaInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Dana MakejevaGynaecology Department, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.

Funding

EEA Financial Mechanism Baltic Research Program 2014-2022 EMP416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is the leading cause of cervical cancer. Screening is one of the main cornerstones of cervical cancer prevention. Self-sampling for HR-HPV is introduced to improve patient involvement in the screening program. The study aimed to understand the hesitancy and barriers to self-sampling among high-risk women who are at risk of developing cervical cancer.

methodsThis qualitative study employed semi-structured telephone interviews to explore the factors behind the refusal of HR-HPV self-sampling among twelve purposefully selected women (aged 25-49) with abnormal Pap smears recruited from a colposcopy clinic within a major urban university hospital in Riga, Latvia. The interviews, conducted between June and September 2022, were transcribed verbatim and subjected to inductive content analysis.

resultsFour inductive categories were developed and described: (1) 'Clinic visit-related distress' described patients' situational anxiety, fears, and during the visit to a healthcare facility that resulted in the refusal to take the HR-HPV self-sampling; (2) 'Health literacy challenges' highlighted patients' lack of knowledge and understanding of cervical cancer causation and screening role in the early detection of cervical cancer; (3) 'Doctor does and knows the best' explored patients' doubts and fears about the accuracy and comparability of HR-HPV self-sampling with conventional screening methods; (4) 'Circumstances that can promote taking the HR-HPV self-sampling' illuminated the circumstances that can encourage women to take the HR-HPV self-sampling.

conclusionsA complex interplay of contextual factors contributed to the hesitancy of HR-HPV self-sampling in the group of women at high risk for cervical cancer, highlighting that women's decision-making regarding this procedure goes beyond its purely clinical aspects.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf CareSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansLatviaMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestQualitative ResearchHigh-risk cervical cancer populationHR-HPVQualitative studyScreeningSelf-sampling

Identifiers

PMID41353417
PMCPMC12797711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.