ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the multiscale structure of urban waterlogging resilience systems for adaptive policy optimisation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban waterlogging resilience systems show complex scale effects and cascading dynamics. Accurately identifying their scale structure and operational order strengthens urban waterlogging resilience and upgrades disaster adaptation efficiency. Most existing studies depend on a 'macro-meso-micro' three-tier scale structure. However, their scale divisions are often constrained by data availability or administrative boundaries, neglecting the multiscale, nested characteristics of resilience systems and the alignment between crucial indicators and scale structures. Using Xiamen Island (XMI), China, as a study area, this research creates a comprehensive analytical framework that integrates multi-source data fusion, network percolation models and machine learning techniques to analyse the scale structure of waterlogging resilience systems. The findings reveal that the robustness of the XMI waterlogging resilience system transitions substantially at three key scale nodes, namely 5 km², 15 km² and 30 km², diverging from conventional administrative scales. The impact mechanisms of several resilience indicators on waterlogging adaptation performance depict notable scale dependence and threshold effects, with smaller scales exhibiting more intricate and diverse mechanisms than larger ones. According to XMI's waterlogging resilience scale structure and the non-linear relationships between critical indicators and adaptation results, this study proposes a differentiated indicator management system and dynamic management mechanisms while offering scientific evidence to support the efficient integration of urban spatial management with waterlogging resilience strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.