ArticleHereditas2025
Multimethodological and multiscale investigation of the therapeutic mechanism of Qian Ji Sheng Xue Pian in treating primary immune thrombocytopenia.
Article in Hereditas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor more than 30 years, Qian Ji Sheng Xue Pian (QJSXP) has been used clinically to treat primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) with good documented efficacy. However, nothing is known about its underlying mechanisms, effective components, and possible targets. To employ several methodologies to initially investigate the possible targets and therapeutic mechanisms of QJSXP in the treatment of ITP.
methodsLiquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) identified the principal chemical elements of QJSXP and assessed its probable active components based on ADME characteristics. The research incorporated multidimensional databases to pinpoint probable targets for the active components. Key pathogenic targets linked to ITP were aggregated from several illness databases, and the STRING and Metascape tools were utilized to examine protein interaction activities and related biological processes. Mendelian randomization (MR) was then utilized to determine beneficial targets for the therapy of ITP. The potential targets, including disease targets and MR-positive targets, were found at the intersection, while risk genes were excluded by heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and Steiger analysis to ascertain the core targets. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were conducted utilizing Schrodinger and Gromacs software to assess the binding affinity of compound-core targets. The toxicological effects of active molecules targeting critical sites were concurrently anticipated using several toxicity databases.
resultsA total of 67 active components and 352 potential targets were discovered in QJSXP, of which 77 were associated with ITP disease targets. Through MR analysis, a total of 12 core genes were identified. Binding scores below - 4.25 kcal/mol constituted 82.0%; docking scores below - 5 kcal/mol represented 60.1%, with an average binding energy of -5.44 kcal/mol. The majority of targets demonstrated strong binding affinity with the components. Toxicity prediction initially highlighted potential hazards, including hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, establishing a foundation for future clinical surveillance.
conclusionThis study has preliminarily identified the active constituents, associated pathways, and possible targets of QJSXP in the treatment of ITP, offering insights for additional experimental validation of QJSXP's mechanism of action in ITP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.