ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Autobiographical narratives in major depression: changes in memory specificity during outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have shown that patients with depression recall fewer specific autobiographical memories, a phenomenon known as overgeneral autobiographical memory (OGM). OGM refers to the retrieval of categorical memories (repeated events) and extended memories (events lasting more than 24 h), rather than specific, single-event recollections. This pattern has been linked to dysfunctional emotion regulation and childhood trauma. While most research has used the Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT) to assess OGM, such standardized cue-word paradigms are limited in capturing how autobiographical memories unfold in real-life psychotherapeutic settings. This study introduces a novel methodology to assess autobiographical memories as they naturally emerge during videotaped psychodynamic psychotherapy sessions.
methodsWe analyzed videotapes of the first and 40th psychodynamic psychotherapy sessions of 55 patients with major depression. Therapist questions served as prompts for autobiographical narratives, which were rated for specificity and overgeneralization (extended, categorical). We also examined the role of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in changes to memory specificity during therapy.
resultsLinear regression analysis showed a significant time × memory-type × ACE interaction. No significant changes were observed for categorical or extended memories. In contrast, for specific memories, higher ACE scores predicted fewer specific memories at baseline but greater increases in specificity from session 1 to 40.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of assessing autobiographical memory specificity directly within psychodynamic psychotherapy sessions. The proposed methodology provides an ecologically valid alternative to traditional lab-based assessments of autobiographical memory and can be applied in the naturalistic context of real-life therapeutic interactions. Our findings suggest a potential improvement in autobiographical memory specificity during psychodynamic psychotherapy - particularly among individuals with higher ACE scores - that may be reliably assessed using this novel approach. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.