Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353331›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

Secular trends in incidence, survival, and health status at diagnosis of dementia in Sweden, 2007-2022.

Mozhu Ding, Stina Ek, Fen Yang, Fang Fang, Katharina Schmidt-Mende, Karin Modig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mozhu DingUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden. mozhu.ding@ki.se.
Stina EkUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.
Fen YangUnit of Integrative Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fang FangUnit of Integrative Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katharina Schmidt-MendeAcademic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm Region, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin ModigUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough past screening cohorts have suggested a decline in the risk of dementia, it is important to monitor the population-level incidence and survival of diagnosed dementia, to inform care utilization and public health policies. This study provides nationwide analyses on time trends in the incidence of dementia diagnosis in Sweden between 2007 and 2022, as well as 5-year survival after a dementia diagnosis.

methodsData from the total Swedish population aged ≥ 61 years during the period 2007-2022 were used. Incident dementia diagnoses were identified from specialist care and dispensed anti-dementia drugs. The annual incidence rate of dementia diagnosis was calculated for the period 2007-2022. The proportion of individuals that survived 5 years after dementia diagnosis was compared across years of diagnosis. Health status at dementia diagnosis was assessed by calculating Charlson Comorbidity Index and Hospital Frailty Risk Score.

resultsAnnual incidence rate of dementia diagnosis decreased from early 2010s and onwards, particularly among older age groups of 80-89 and ≥ 90 years. Mean age at dementia diagnosis remained constant, i.e., 82.2 years during 2007-2009 and 82.2 years during 2019-2022. The proportion of individuals with frailty at diagnosis increased from 74.3% in 2007-2009 to 80.6% in 2019-2022 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39-1.46); the proportion of individuals with comorbidities also increased over the same period. The proportion that survived 5 years since dementia diagnosis remained constant at 33% during 2007-2017 but improved over time when accounting for comorbidity and frailty level at diagnosis.

conclusionsWhile the incidence of dementia diagnosis has declined from early 2010s and onwards, patients diagnosed today are on average frailer and more comorbid than those diagnosed 15 years ago, which partly explains the lack of improvement in dementia survival over time. Enhancing healthcare planning for people with dementia diagnosis and improving their survival is still highly relevant.

Indexed as

DementiaHealth StatusAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSwedenComorbidityDementia diagnosisFrailtyNationwideSurvivalTime trends

Identifiers

PMID41353331
PMCPMC12696926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.