Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353326›Full record

ReviewHuman genomics2025

From bulk RNA sequencing to spatial transcriptomics: a comparative review of differential gene expression analysis methods.

Maryam Kalantari-Dehaghi, Neda Ghohabi-Esfahani, Modjtaba Emadi-Baygi

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryam Kalantari-DehaghiDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID 0009-0003-4621-6122
Neda Ghohabi-EsfahaniDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0539-4603
Modjtaba Emadi-BaygiDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran. emadi-m@sku.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-6760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscriptome analysis is essential to dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic differences and disease mechanisms. Traditionally, microarrays were used, but RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a more powerful and reproducible alternative. RNA-seq is widely applied for differential expression analysis (DEA) analysis, making it possible to characterize gene expression heterogeneity across diverse biological conditions. MAIN BODY: Several approaches are used in RNA-seq, including bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), direct RNA sequencing (DRS), and spatial transcriptomics (ST), every distinct offering unique insight. Bulk RNA-seq offers a global perspective on transcriptional activity, while scRNA-seq dissects the intrinsic cellular diversity and developmental trajectories, aiding for delineating molecular profiles of low-abundance cell phenotypes and complex biology. However, both methods face challenges such as biases from short-read sequencing, limited isoform resolution, and the loss of spatial information. Advanced methods such as DRS and ST have emerged to address these limitations. RNA-seq data analysis comprises a multi-phase workflow, including read trimming, alignment, quantification, normalization, and differential expression testing. As sequencing technologies evolve, numerous computational tools and statistical methods have been developed to support DEA across bulk, scRNA-seq, DRS, and ST datasets, enhancing our ability to interpret transcriptomic changes in health and disease. Applications of RNA-seq include interrogation of multifactorial disease mechanisms, biomarker discovery, and the investigation of gene regulatory networks.

conclusionExamining gene expression through these diverse RNA-seq modalities deepens our understanding of cellular processes, transcript modifications, tissue spatial organization, and gene expression variability. This review highlights current DEA methods in R and Python for bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, DRS, and ST, showcasing the rapidly evolving landscape of transcriptome research.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeAnimalsHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisSpatial TranscriptomicsBulk RNA-seqDEADirect RNA sequencingPythonRscRNA-seqSpatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID41353326
PMCPMC12797438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.