ArticleCommunications biology2025
Evolutionary trajectories determine feasibility of collateral sensitivity-based antibiotic treatment strategies in critical bacterial pathogens.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collateral sensitivity-harnessing microbial vulnerabilities as a solution to antimicrobial resistance.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic correlates of ceftazidime-avibactam collateral sensitivity in tigecycline-resistant NDM-producing enterobacter cloacae complex.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rise of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria necessitates innovative therapeutic strategies, such as collateral sensitivity where resistance to one antibiotic increases susceptibility to another. We explored the clinical relevance of collateral sensitivity through genetic engineering and experimental evolution in the six critical bacterial pathogens Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Our analysis of E. coli showed that clinically relevant resistance mutations did not confer collateral sensitivity, but we were able to identify at least three novel classes of ciprofloxacin-resistance mutations that cause collateral sensitivity to multiple antibiotics. Further analysis showed that the development of collateral effects differed between the tested species. Collateral sensitivity to gentamicin developed during ciprofloxacin-resistance evolution in almost all tested species, but A. baumannii developed collateral resistance instead. P. aeruginosa consistently developed collateral sensitivity, suggesting its potential for targeted treatment strategies. These findings highlight the complexity of collateral effects and support its therapeutic potential in designing more effective antibiotic regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.