Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353278›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Trophic niche partitioning in giant clams.

Isis Guibert, Inga Elizabeth Conti-Jerpe, Leonard Pons, Kuselah Tayaban, Sherry Lyn Sayco, Patrick Cabaitan, Cecilia Conaco, David Michael Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. δEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isis GuibertSwire Institute of Marine Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-6659
Inga Elizabeth Conti-JerpeScience Unit, Lingnan University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-8371
Leonard PonsSwire Institute of Marine Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kuselah TayabanMarine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, 1101, Quezon City, Philippines.
Sherry Lyn SaycoMarine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, 1101, Quezon City, Philippines.
Patrick CabaitanMarine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, 1101, Quezon City, Philippines.
Cecilia ConacoMarine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, 1101, Quezon City, Philippines.
David Michael BakerSwire Institute of Marine Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. dmbaker@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-4954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystems are influenced by competition for limited resources, a driver of niche partitioning. Over time, the emergence of novel traits facilitating new resource exploitation can reduce competition. However, additional layers of complexity, like symbiosis, complicate our understanding of the patterns shaping reef communities. Therefore, empirical evidence of niche partitioning reducing competition in symbiotic benthic communities is limited. Using a unique common garden experiment, we examined the nutritional strategies of six giant clam holobionts and characterized their symbiont assemblages. Variation in trophic strategies confirmed trophic niche partitioning, as species fell along a continuum from highly heterotrophic to highly autotrophic. Tridacna gigas and T. derasa, listed as critically endangered and endangered, respectively, were the most autotrophic and fast-growing species. We found significant phylogenetic signals in trophic niche scores, growth rate, and shell length, indicating the role of natural selection in shaping giant clam nutritional ecology. We conclude that niche partitioning is a driver of giant clam evolution with benefits and costs; high autotrophy reliance results in greater growth rates yet may increase vulnerability to disturbances. Given the impact of human activities on giant clams, conservation efforts should focus on these ecosystem engineers, especially highly autotrophic and geographically constrained species.

Indexed as

BivalviaEcosystemAnimalsPhylogenySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID41353278
PMCPMC12789454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.