Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353253›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Thermal conductivity modeling beyond the dilute limit using a body-centered cubic framework for densely packed polymer composites.

Lu He, Kai Wu, Qiang Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lu HeCollege of Polymer Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymer Materials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Kai WuCollege of Polymer Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymer Materials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. kaiwu@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-0442
Qiang FuCollege of Polymer Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymer Materials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-3315

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52373042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing models of thermal conductivity in polymer composites typically address dilute to semi-dilute filler concentrations (≤ 40 vol%) yet fail to capture the strong interactions that arise when fillers are closely packed. In densely filled systems, these interactions reorganize heat transport according to the principles of thermal resistance, directing it along preferred pathways. In this study, we introduce a mechanistic thermal conductivity model based on a simplified body-centered cubic framework. This model effectively captures the essential impact of reduced interparticle distances and enhanced filler interactions in densely packed composites, enabling a more accurate description of heat flow by forcing it to follow the least-resistance pathways. This approach delivers high-precision predictions across a wide range of filler concentrations (0-68 vol%), spanning nearly the entire practical concentration range, and has been rigorously validated against diverse cross-material datasets. This model also can help to offer a physical interpretation of the thermal percolation transition, identifying both its underlying mechanism and the quantitative conditions for its onset. Its modular and computationally efficient design reduces reliance on extensive experimental testing, providing both a practical tool for optimizing composite design and a deeper quantitative understanding of thermal transport in composite materials.

Identifiers

PMID41353253
PMCPMC12789673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.