Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353250›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Distance mapping for quantifying contact surface area and inter-bone distance in wrist CT imaging: a comparative study of four methods.

Elou S Kingma, Johannes G G Dobbe, Liron S Duraku, Charlotte M Lameijer, Sjoerd H den Uil, Martijn Baas, Geert J Streekstra

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elou S KingmaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. e.s.kingma@amsterdamumc.nl.
Johannes G G DobbeBiomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Liron S DurakuDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Charlotte M LameijerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd H den UilDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn BaasDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Geert J StreekstraBiomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When assessing osteoarthritis, the congruency of articular surfaces and cartilage integrity are crucial. Static or dynamic CT scanning and subsequent bone-to-bone distance mapping enables a non-invasive evaluation of these factors. Distance maps visualize local inter-bone distances and its extent can serve as a representation of the contact surface area within a joint. A contact surface area can be defined by applying distance and angle thresholds between adjacent bones. These thresholds may affect the selected contact area and therefore influence distance measures. Several methods for distance map generation use different distance measurement approaches, with or without an angle threshold. The impact of the chosen method and thresholds remains unclear. This study evaluates the sensitivity to threshold settings of different methods in radioscaphoid, radiolunate, and scapholunate joints. Static 3D-CT scans of twenty healthy and eleven pathological wrists were analyzed. A mixed effect model was conducted to compare the sensitivity of different methods using particular angle and distance thresholds. The method combining perpendicular distance and angle thresholds was shown to be the least sensitive to changing threshold values, resulting in the smallest variations in observed contact surface area and bone-to-bone distances.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisTomography, X-Ray ComputedWrist JointAdultAgedFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedBiomechanicsDistance mapsOsteoarthritisWrist joint

Identifiers

PMID41353250
PMCPMC12789078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.