Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353239›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Female leadership and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from China.

Wanli Liao, Shuangyi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wanli LiaoBusiness School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Shuangyi ChenSchool of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. SylviaChen321@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of female leadership on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating disagreement among Chinese listed companies from 2015 to 2023. We find that female leadership significantly mitigate ESG rating disagreement. These findings remain robust after conducting a range of tests to solve the issue of selection bias and reverse causality. The role of female leadership in mitigating ESG disagreement is attributed to three aspects, such as the promotion in environmental investment (E), the improvement of customer protection (S), and the enhancement in corporate internal governance (G). The curbing impact of female leadership on ESG rating disagreement is more pronounced for non-state-owned firms, firms in low-pollution industries, firms located in eastern regions, and firms at earlier life-cycle stages. These results may reflect that female leaders exert different governance effects under varying institutional environments, market pressures, industry characteristics, and stages of corporate development. Our study contributes to the literature on the role of female leadership in corporate governance and sustainable development.

Indexed as

IndustryLeadershipSustainable DevelopmentChinaFemaleHumansCustomer protectionEnvironmental investmentESG disagreementFemale leadershipInternal governance

Identifiers

PMID41353239
PMCPMC12796444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.