Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Linear and nonlinear effects of Spatial and Temporal attention: human data and drift diffusion model.

Isaac R Christian, A J Lonski, Javier Masís, Abigail Loveys, Michael S A Graziano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isaac R ChristianDepartment of Psychology , Princeton University , Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA. isaacrc@princeton.edu.
A J LonskiDepartment of Psychology , Princeton University , Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA.
Javier MasísPrinceton Neuroscience Institute , Princeton University , Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA.
Abigail LoveysDepartment of Psychology , Princeton University , Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA.
Michael S A GrazianoDepartment of Psychology , Princeton University , Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA.

Funding

AE Studios 24400B1459FA010Princeton Neuroscience Institute Innovation Fund 24400E2349FA010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention can be affected by expectations about where and when stimuli will appear. These two influences may interact with each other in complex ways. To explore these possibilities, we used an attention paradigm that manipulated three factors: two explicit cues guiding anticipatory attention before each trial, and implicit temporal statistics learned during task performance. When analyzing the data for linear trends, we found that each of these factors impacted performance but did not interact. When analyzing nonlinear trends in the data, we found these factors interacted: expectations about task duration shaped spatiotemporal attention while performing the task. We evaluated whether attentional effects across spatial and temporal domains could be explained by one unitary mechanism, using an augmented drift diffusion model. In the model, attention is allocated according to an interplay between the costs and benefits of maintaining attention. The model successfully replicated the linear effects observed in the human data, and accounted for some but not all nonlinear features in the data, suggesting that many disparate features of attention can be parsimoniously explained by a cost-benefit framework.

Indexed as

AttentionSpace PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleNonlinear DynamicsYoung AdultEndogenous attentionExpectationSpatial attentionTemporal attentionVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID41353234
PMCPMC12789599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.