Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353223›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An investigation of race bias in deep learning-based segmentation of prostate MRI images.

Maram Alqarni, Emma-Louise Jones, Luis Ribeiro, Hema Verma, Sian Cooper, Vinod Mullassery, Stephen Morris, Teresa Guerrero Urbano, Andrew P King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maram AlqarniSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom. maram.a.alqarni@kcl.ac.uk.
Emma-Louise JonesSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom.
Luis RibeiroDepartment of Clinical Haematology and Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Hema VermaDepartment of Clinical Haematology and Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Sian CooperDepartment of Clinical Haematology and Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Vinod MullasseryDepartment of Clinical Haematology and Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Stephen MorrisDepartment of Clinical Haematology and Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Teresa Guerrero UrbanoDepartment of Clinical Haematology and Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Andrew P KingSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom.

Funding

Radiation Research Unit at the Cancer Research UK City of London Centre Award [C7893/A28990]Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering at King's College London (WT 203148/Z/16/Z)Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) has been proposed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate segmentation for various clinical tasks, including radiotherapy treatment planning. In other applications, DL models have exhibited performance bias by protected attributes such as race. To investigate possible race bias in prostate MRI segmentation, DL models were trained on five clinical T2-weighted MRI datasets with varying White/Black race imbalance, plus one public dataset with unknown races, and evaluated on 32 White/Black matched clinical subjects. For the models trained with differing levels of race imbalance, the best performance for both races was when the training set was race-balanced. A linear mixed-effects model analysis showed that Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) differences between Black and White subjects depended on race representation in the training data, with a slight reduction in White-Black performance gap as Black representation increased (p < 0.05). The model trained on public data showed no difference in performance between races for DSC. The findings reveal the potential for race bias in DL prostate MRI segmentation performance when training sets are highly imbalanced. We argue for transparency in race reporting in DL prostate segmentation training data and reporting of test performance across demographic groups, with appropriate ethical/legal safeguards.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRacismBlack or African AmericanHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhiteBiasDeep learningMRIProstateRaceRadiotherapySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41353223
PMCPMC12689646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.