ArticleScientific reports2025
Dynamic decision making simulation with limited data via causal inference.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The application of machine learning in decision-making has become widespread. However, investigating the impact of interventions in decision-making tasks poses significant challenges, particularly in scenarios with limited observable data. Specifically, when interventions are introduced into the decision-making system, their effects extend beyond specific variables, creating a cascade of causal relationships that influence the entire decision-making process. Consequently, traditional decision-making methods based on static data prove insufficient and fail to consider the comprehensive data post-intervention. In response to these challenges, this paper proposes a framework for simulating interventions in decision-making tasks. By uncovering causal relationships within the dataset, the framework infers post-intervention data. Two inference methods are also designed within the framework: direct computation of weights and model-fitted weights. We employ our proposed framework and algorithms to simulate the data changes under two scenarios: PCOS Prediction and The Law School Admissions. By integrating validated knowledge, the experimental results demonstrate that our framework more realistically simulates the intervention process, providing more reliable outcomes for machine learning tasks, compared with the static decision-making with interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.