Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353192›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025

Microbial load and composition of intrauterine device string correlates with symptomatic removals in parous women.

Laura K Hamann, Rachel L Washburn, Michael Makii, Elisa Brown, Moss Hampton, Natalia Schlabritz-Lutsevich, Gary Ventolini, Kendra P Rumbaugh, Craig Tipton, Whitni K Redman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura K Hamann *Department of Life and Physical Sciences, Ivy Tech Community College, Sellersburg, IN, USA.
Rachel L Washburn *Department of Life and Physical Sciences, Ivy Tech Community College, Sellersburg, IN, USA.
Michael MakiiMedical Center Health System, Texas Tech Physicians, Odessa, TX, USA.
Elisa BrownMedical Center Health System, Texas Tech Physicians, Odessa, TX, USA.
Moss HamptonMedical Center Health System, Texas Tech Physicians, Odessa, TX, USA.
Natalia Schlabritz-LutsevichPermian Basin School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Odessa, TX, USA.
Gary VentoliniPermian Basin School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Odessa, TX, USA.
Kendra P RumbaughImmunology and Molecular Microbiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Craig TiptonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Whitni K RedmanImmunology and Molecular Microbiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA. wredman@binghamton.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA contraceptive intrauterine device (IUD) is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved method of contraception that is effective and generally well tolerated by patients. However, reports show that IUDs might be associated with inflammation, leading to symptoms like abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Pelvic inflammation potentially could be linked to IUD pathogenic biofilm colonization. However, the role of non-pathological microbial communities in this context is not well understood. The aim of the present observational study was to describe the microbiome of the IUD string located in the vagina and cervix in patients with and without IUD related complications.

methodsPatients being seen for the removal of their IUD were identified for this study and were grouped according to removal for ‘asymptomatic’ or ‘symptomatic’ reasons. Asymptomatic removals included IUD expiration and desire to conceive while symptomatic removals stemmed from patient complaints, including abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, and vaginitis. The IUD strings were sent for microbiome profiling by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene sequencing to characterize bacterial composition and universal 16S quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to estimate bacterial bioburden. Microbial composition was compared to determine if symptomatic IUD removal was associated with altered bacterial load, diversity, or composition, with an emphasis on Lactobacillus and non-Lactobacillus abundance.

resultsAsymptomatic removals (group A, n = 8) had higher parity (p = 0.012) while relative abundance of Lactobacilli did not differ between groups (p = 0.57). Group A demonstrated a higher abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri compared to symptomatic removals (group S, n = 5), which showed increased overall bacterial load (p = 0.011) and a greater relative abundance of non-Lactobacillus species (p = 0.054), including potentially pathogenic genera such as Fusobacterium and Haemophilus.

conclusionsThis study revealed differences in bacterial populations associated with symptomatic IUD removal with a higher overall bacterial burden and abundance of non-Lactobacillus genera. Though the current study is not powered to make conclusions on whether different types of IUDs have differential microbiota or how IUD type relates to complications, these results suggest that the microbiome may contribute. Future research should investigate bacterial composition through the duration of IUD use as well as the variation of the bacterial composition on the different components of the IUD device and explore the potential of targeted intervention with probiotics or antibiotics to prevent or reduce complications associated with IUD contraception.

Indexed as

BiofilmFemale reproductionIntrauterine deviceLactobacillus rheuteriVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID41353192
PMCPMC12781424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.