ArticleBioData mining2025
Clinically aligned multi-modal image-text model for pan-cancer prognosis prediction.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer prognosis prediction increasingly leverages multi-modal learning, yet existing approaches often rely on omics data that are costly and difficult to collect in routine practice. Pathology reports, by contrast, are routinely generated and widely available, providing a practical textual modality complementary to histology. We present CALM (Clinical Anchor text guided Learning for Multi-modal prognosis prediction), a general framework that integrates pathology images and reports through risk-specific anchor texts. CALM systematically incorporates prior clinical knowledge by guiding image and text alignment with large language model–derived anchors, further refined via few-shot tuning. Across 14 TCGA cancer types, CALM improved prognostic accuracy compared to image and text baselines (up to +11.5% mean C-index), with enhanced training stability. CALM achieved performance comparable to image–omics integration in PORPOISE (0.652 vs. 0.644), highlighting the prognostic value of text. External validation in an independent head and neck cancer cohort demonstrated that CALM improved generalization in zero-shot settings. Attention-based interpretation further confirmed that CALM aligns diagnostic text with tumor regions. Together, CALM offers a simple, interpretable, and clinically viable strategy for prognosis prediction, expanding the role of routine pathology reports as scalable priors in multi-modal oncology AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.