Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353185›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2025

Risk stratification of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis recurrence: integrating acute kidney injury, biomarkers, composite scores, and machine learning models.

Nasser Mousa, Alaa Elmetwalli, Mostafa Abdelsalam, Mohamed Wahba, Mohamed Selim, Dina Nour, Eman Abdelkader, Ahmed El-Eraky, Amany Hasson, Ahmed E Taha and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Nasser Mousa *Tropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. nassermousa@mans.edu.eg.
Alaa Elmetwalli *Prince Fahad bin Sultan Research Chair for Biomedical Research, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. aelmetwalli@ut.edu.sa.
Mostafa AbdelsalamInternal Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed WahbaInternal Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed Seliminternal Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Dina NourTropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Eman AbdelkaderInternal Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ahmed El-ErakyTropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Amany HassonTropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ahmed E TahaMicrobiology and Immunology unit, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka city, Saudi Arabia.
Eman MousaFaculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Adel El-AssmyIntern doctor, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ali El-AssmyIntern doctor, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Sherif ShihaTropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Muhammad DiastyTropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohammed AbdelazizTropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Shereen A MouradDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Nader ElmalkyInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka city, Saudi Arabia.
Marwa MansourInternal Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimRecurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a major concern for cirrhotic patients with ascites. This study seeks to identify predictors of recurrent SBP using clinical factors, inflammatory markers, and machine learning models. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study involved 347 patients with cirrhotic ascites and SBP. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the predictive ability of biomarkers. A composite score was created to evaluate the risk stratification model. Different machine learning models were compared for predictive accuracy.

resultsEighty-three patients (23.9%) experienced recurrent SBP. Independent predictors of recurrence in multivariable analysis included acute kidney injury (AKI), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, higher serum bilirubin levels, a higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and lack of β-blocker use. A composite 10-point score (including AKI, CRP > 50 mg/L, low albumin levels < 2.5 g/dL, ascitic protein < 1.0 g/dL, albumin/ascitic ratio < 2.5 [2 points], MELD ≥ 15, diabetes, multidrug-resistant organism [MDRO] infection, and non-use of β-blockers) stratified the risk of recurrence into low (0-3: 15%), moderate (4-6: 45%), and high (7-10: 80%) categories. Machine learning models outperformed supervised machine logistic regression in predicting recurrence. Logistic regression achieved 70% accuracy, 65% sensitivity, and 68% specificity. The decision tree model improved accuracy to 75%, sensitivity to 72%, and specificity to 71%. The random forest model showed the best performance with 78% accuracy, 77% sensitivity, and 76% specificity.

conclusionA composite score, combined with machine-learning models like random forest, enhances risk assessment for SBP recurrence. Clinical predictors such as AKI, CRP, bilirubin, MELD, PPI use, and β-blockers non-use help in targeted prevention.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryComposite scoringInflammatory markersMachine learningPredictive modelingRecurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Identifiers

PMID41353185
PMCPMC12699928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.