Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353181›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

Medicolegal litigation in general surgery: a comparison between England and the United States.

Vivien Nebo, Michael G Fadel, Liam Poynter, Hutan Ashrafian, Charles Bailey, Matyas Fehervari

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivien NeboDepartment of General Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, United Kingdom.
Michael G FadelDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Liam PoynterDepartment of General Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, United Kingdom.
Hutan AshrafianDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charles BaileyDepartment of General Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, United Kingdom.
Matyas FehervariDepartment of General Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, United Kingdom. matyas.fehervari15@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical negligence claims represent a significant financial and reputational burden for healthcare systems worldwide. While the United States is often perceived as having a highly litigious medical culture, comparative data between the United Kingdom and United States, especially in general surgery, are limited.

methodsData on clinical negligence claims in general surgery were obtained through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to NHS Resolution for England, covering financial years 2013/2014 to 2021/2022 and national databases from the United States between 2014 and 2022. Only successful claims with awarded damages were included. Population-adjusted annual means, total claim volumes and associated costs were calculated.

resultsEngland recorded 5829 successful claims in general surgery over 9 years, with an estimated total cost of £873 million. The United States recorded 12 162 successful claims, which adjusted for population equated to 2043 claims, with an estimated adjusted cost of £563 million. England had three times more population-adjusted successful claims than the United States and nearly double the associated costs. The most common cause of successful litigation in England was "failure or delay in treatment". Only 6.1% of successful claims were attributed to "operator error".

conclusionsDespite the United States' reputation for higher litigation, England had more successful, population-adjusted general surgery claims and costs over the study period. These findings highlight the importance of systemic, cultural and structural differences in how claims are handled and resolved in each healthcare system.

Indexed as

General SurgeryMalpracticeEnglandHumansMedical ErrorsState MedicineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41353181
PMCPMC12784593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.