ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Characterization of error-related potentials during the command of a lower-limb exoskeleton based on deep learning.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain-Machine Interfaces (BMI) based on motor imagery (MI) are promising assistive neurotechnology tools for gait rehabilitation that allow users to control exoskeletons by imagining motor actions. Literature has proven the influence of BMIs over neuroplasticity mechanisms. However, the accuracy of MI-BMIs is often limited by the weak brain signals associated with lower-limb movements. To enhance system reliability and safety, Error-Related Potentials (ErrP), which are exogenous potentials evoked by erroneous system actions, can be integrated to correct commands. This study characterizes and detects ErrP during the use of a lower-limb exoskeleton, making use of a deep learning approach to improve accuracy and robustness over traditional classifiers.
methodsErrP detection is performed using the EEG-Inception neural network, a convolutional deep learning model, and applying data augmentation techniques to the imbalanced dataset. The methodology is tested first for the characterization of ErrP during the start of gait with static data and, after confirming its improvement, regarding previous developments, it is also applied to motion data during the stop of the exoskeleton. With this objective, an experimental protocol is designed to evoke ErrP and NoErrP during motion, using tactile stimuli. ErrP is elicited when the exoskeleton stops erroneously in a gait region, while NoErrP is generated when it stops correctly in a stop region.
resultsThe proposed approach achieves a True Positive Rate (TPR) of approximately 95% and a False Positive Rate (FPR) below 20% in both static and motion conditions, significantly outperforming traditional ensemble classifiers. In terms of MI-BMI performance, these results indicate that most erroneous commands are successfully canceled, while only a small number of correct commands are wrongly canceled. In addition, statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the detection of ErrP in static and motion scenarios, nor between sessions or subjects just in static. However, significant differences are observed between subjects in motion and also the outcomes of ErrP and NoErrP classes in both scenarios.
conclusionThe EEG-Inception neural network provides a robust and accurate method for ErrP detection. Future research will focus on integrating ErrP detection with MI classifiers and validating the system with SCI patients for improved gait rehabilitation therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.