ArticleBMC psychology2025
Manmade and real-world items in visual working memory differentially regulate priority for accessing visual consciousness.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have found that the items retained in visual working memory (VWM) regulate the time required to access visual consciousness. However, this finding obtained from manmade stimuli may not applicable to real-world objects, as objects in real life are typically connected meaningfully. We used breaking continuous flash suppression ( b-CFS) and intermixed a delayed match-to-sample task to determine whether manmade and real-world representations in VWM differentially regulate priority for accessing visual consciousness, to determine whether VWM retains manmade and real-world objects at different representational levels. The results found that when the stimulus was congruent with manmade items in VWM, the stimulus was detected faster than the memory-incongruent stimulus, whereas the memory-incongruent stimulus was detected faster than the memory-congruent stimulus for the real-world objects. These findings suggest that VWM regulates conscious perception at the feature level for manmade stimuli and at the object-identity level for real-world stimuli, highlighting the hierarchical nature of representational processing in conscious access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.