ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Comparative chemical and biological evaluation of Urtica dioica extracts obtained by methanol and hexane: antioxidant, cytotoxic, apoptotic, and antimicrobial potentials.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Phytochemical Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Production, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Electrospun Nanofibers Using Nettle (Polymers · 2026Article
- African Medicinal Plants Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): A Systematic Review of Ethnobotanical Surveys, Phytochemistry and Anti-TNBC Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrated chemical and biological characterization of Hypericum perforatum extract using LC-MS/MS and in vitro functional assays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrtica dioica L. is a widely utilized medicinal plant with potential antioxidant, cytotoxic, and antimicrobial properties.
methodsThis study aimed to investigate its multi-target biological activities across four cell lines (A549, MDA-MB-231, HCT116, and BEAS-2B) while evaluating the impact of two extraction solvents (acidified methanol and hexane) on activity outcomes.
resultsThe acidified methanolic extract exhibited higher total phenolic (61.25 ± 3.07 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid (51.20 ± 2.01 mg CE/g) content, correlating with superior antioxidant activity (DPPH: 84.36 ± 1.50 mg TE/g; CUPRAC: 174.04 ± 9.54 mg TE/g). In contrast, the hexane extract demonstrated stronger cytotoxicity across cancer cell lines (IC50: 3.10–4.12 µg/mL), along with significant induction of apoptosis and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, despite lower antioxidant capacity. In addition, both extracts increased the protein levels of p21 and cleaved caspase-3, suggesting involvement of cell cycle inhibition and activation of intrinsic apoptotic signalling pathways. Moderate antimicrobial activity was also observed, with inhibition zones ranging from 7 to 10 mm across bacterial and fungal strains.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the bioactive potential of U. dioica and the critical role of extraction solvent in modulating its total phenolic and flavonoid contents and biological effects. The observed upregulation of p21 and cleaved caspase-3 further supports the notion that U. dioica extracts may exert antiproliferative activity through p21-mediated cell cycle control and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Further in vivo studies and mechanistic investigations are needed to confirm these observations and clarify their potential therapeutic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.