ArticleBMC public health2025
911 calls for service and community context: associations between community safety needs and neighborhood environment.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCalls for service (CFS) to 911 are one way to assess both community safety and public health needs. While an abundance of literature demonstrates that conditions within the neighborhood environment may contribute to violent- and property-related CFS, limited research is available on the association between neighborhood environment and non-crime related CFS, which constitute the majority of 911 calls and present avoidable risks due to police intervention. Furthermore, many studies fail to distinguish between police-initiated and public-initiated CFS, despite public-initiated calls theoretically representing a recognized need from residents rather than what is observed by policing alone. The current study therefore seeks to improve our understanding of how community needs align with neighborhood resource allocation by examining spatiotemporal associations between non-violent, public-initiated CFS and neighborhood characteristics in Durham, North Carolina.
methodsUsing publicly-available data from the Durham Open Portal, we analyzed approximately 640,000 public-initiated CFS data aggregated to the census block group between 2015 and 2021. Non-violent, public-initiated CFS were aggregated into the following groups: alarm, disturbance, sound of gunshots, medical assistance, mental health, lost and found persons, noise complaint, other (panhandling, prostitution, gambling), property, public assistance, substance use, and suspicious activity/behavior. Census block group level evictions from 2015-2021 and poverty and unemployment from 2015-2019 were assessed as neighborhood characteristics. We assessed correlations between call groups and neighborhood characteristics. Neighborhood eviction density, poverty rate, and unemployment rate were examined cross-sectionally in relation to public-initiated CFS, adjusting for education, race, sex, and age.
resultsPublic-initiated CFS were moderately to strongly correlated with evictions and poverty rate. Similarly, non-violent, public-initiated CFS exhibited significantly positive associations with levels of evictions and poverty. Unemployment rate, however, was not associated with non-violent, public-initiated CFS.
conclusionThis work provides important insights into the neighborhood conditions associated with a greater demand for public safety resources via 911 call centers. More research is needed, qualitative and quantitative, to understand public safety funding that best aligns with community needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.