Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41353108›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

Genomic and biological characterization of Streptomyces strains isolated from barley.

Margaux Cheminat, Loïc Waeckerle, Abdelmalek Alioua, Valérie Cognat, Mathieu Erhardt, Sandrine Koechler, Kevin Roger, Daniel Muller, David Pflieger, Julie Zumsteg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Margaux CheminatInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Loïc WaeckerleInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Abdelmalek AliouaInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Valérie CognatInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Mathieu ErhardtInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Sandrine KoechlerInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Kevin RogerInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Daniel MullerUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR5557 Ecologie Microbienne, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, F- 69622, France.
David PfliegerInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Julie ZumstegInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Hubert SchallerInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Florence Arsène-PloetzeInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. florence.ploetze@ibmp-cnrs.unistra.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant microbiota has received increasing attention in recent years. In particular, the microbiota associated with cereals is being extensively studied to identify bacterial strains that can promote plant health and growth. Barley is the fourth most important cereal worldwide in terms of agricultural production. Intensive barley agriculture requires the use of chemical fertilizers to compensate for nutrient deficiencies in soils and limit pathogen development. The isolation and use of bacteria that can enhance the bioavailability of soil nutrients and inhibit the development of plant pathogens could ultimately limit the use of these chemicals. In this study, we have isolated from a barley microbiota three bacterial strains belonging to the genus Streptomyces. These strains were characterized and named GPA1, GPAT2, and GPN2.

resultsThese three closely related isolates were from the same bacterial genus Streptomyces. Based on a phylogenetic analysis, the strains GPAT2 and GPN2 were classified as Streptomyces murinus, while GPA1 was identified as a new species. All strains showed antagonistic activity against two microorganisms that inhibit barley germination: Pseudomonas sp. MRN1 and Fusarium sp. CK. In addition, these strains exhibited different effects on the growth of barley cultivated under hydroponic and axenic conditions. In fact, GPN2 appeared to have no effect whereas the inoculation of barley seedlings with GPAT2 and GPA1 resulted in a reduction and an increase in root length after two weeks of growth, respectively. GPA1 had various Plant Growth-Promoting (PGP) abilities, including phosphate and zinc solubilization and siderophore production. A metabolite profiling of the GPA1 bacterial culture also showed its production and excretion of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA).

conclusionIn this study, we have characterized three closely related bacteria, which display different effects on barley seedlings growth. These results revealed that the type of interactions of Streptomyces with barley is strain-dependent, suggesting that these interactions may arise from specific molecular mechanisms acquired through coevolutionary processes.

Indexed as

HordeumStreptomycesAntibiosisDNA, BacterialFusariumGenome, BacterialGenomicsGerminationIndoleacetic AcidsPhylogenyPlant RootsPseudomonasRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeedlingsSoil MicrobiologyDNA, BacterialIndoleacetic AcidsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBarleyBiocontrol activityIAA productionNutrients solubilizationPhyllosphereRoot growth enhancementStreptomyces

Identifiers

PMID41353108
PMCPMC12805717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.