ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2026
Optimizing Patient Selection for Reduced Nonrelapse Mortality After Reduced-Intensity Conditioning: A CIBMTR Analysis.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is generally associated with lower nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but higher relapse risk compared to myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The Risk assessment for the Intensity of Conditioning regimen in Elderly patients (RICE) score, developed using a large Japanese cohort, was designed to identify patients likely to benefit from reduced NRM with RIC. It is calculated based on three factors: advanced age, high comorbidities, and use of umbilical cord blood donor. PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluated the applicability of the RICE score in a Western population using a publicly available CIBMTR dataset. STUDY
designThis study included 2595 patients aged 40 to 65 years with AML and MDS who underwent their first HCT between 2009 and 2015. The primary endpoint was NRM, stratified by conditioning intensity and RICE score.
resultsAmong patients with a low RICE score, MAC was associated with similar NRM (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.06; P = .150) but lower relapse, resulting in improved disease-free survival (DFS). In contrast, among patients with a high RICE score, NRM was significantly lower with RIC compared to MAC (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.99; P = .048), while DFS was similar due to a higher relapse rate with RIC.
conclusionThis study provides external validation of the RICE score in a Western cohort and suggests its potential to inform conditioning-intensity selection based on individual patient characteristics. This simple, data-driven tool may help accurately assess the risk of NRM associated with conditioning intensity and improve transplant outcomes across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.